Legal due diligence

Due diligence is most valuable where it changes the negotiation. We run Dutch legal due diligence that surfaces the issues which genuinely move price, structure or certainty, and we report in a form the transaction team can use at the negotiating table. The work is scoped to the target. We prepare red-flag reports for competitive auctions, full-scope reports for bilateral processes and complex targets, and vendor due diligence for sell-side processes. We link relevant findings to the way they can be addressed in the transaction: a warranty, an indemnity, a condition, a price adjustment or the W&I cover.

When clients call us

  • You are about to launch diligence on a Dutch or cross-border target
  • An auction asks for red-flag reporting on a tight clock
  • You need vendor due diligence to support a sale process
  • Findings from initial diligence need a view on what to do next
  • A specific risk area (regulatory, IP, employment) needs focused attention

Key legal & commercial issues

I.

Scoping the work to the transaction

Due diligence has a defined purpose: to confirm what the buyer is acquiring and to surface the risks that change negotiation positions. Where we act for the seller, it also informs the disclosure schedule supporting the warranty package. Scoping is therefore the most important decision, going deeper on the items that matter to price and certainty and more lightly on the items that do not.

We agree scope, materiality and reporting format with the transaction team at the outset. A focused red-flag report is the usual form on mid-market transactions. Larger and more complex targets, including regulated businesses and businesses in distress, call for a full-scope report with appendices that document title, key contracts and regulatory positions in detail.

II.

Areas we cover

  • Corporate, capitalisation, group structure and KvK filings
  • Material contracts, change-of-control and termination exposure
  • Employment, pensions, equity plans and works council
  • Real estate, environment and permits
  • IP, IT, open-source, data protection and cybersecurity
  • Regulatory, sanctions, competition and FDI screening
  • Litigation, disputes and historic investigations
  • Tax positions (in conjunction with tax counsel)
  • Financing, security packages and intercompany arrangements
III.

Reporting that the SPA team can use

Our reports draw a clear distinction between points that would stop the transaction, items to be addressed before signing, items to be addressed before closing, and items to be priced or documented through warranties, indemnities, conditions or W&I cover. Regular findings updates help avoid surprises at the end of the process, and the disclosure letter is built alongside the report rather than assembled at signing.

IV.

Vendor due diligence

On sell-side mandates, we run vendor legal due diligence that allows the seller to control the presentation of known issues, sets the disclosure regime for the data room, and can reduce the price adjustment that follows where a buyer discovers those issues in its own diligence.

What we advise on

What we advise on

  • Buy-side red-flag and full-scope legal due diligence
  • Vendor legal due diligence for sell-side processes
  • Cross-border due diligence as Dutch lead counsel, or as Dutch counsel within a team led from another jurisdiction
  • Carve-out and perimeter analysis for asset deals
  • Regulatory and FDI screening assessments
  • Pre-acquisition cybersecurity and data protection reviews
  • Translation of findings into SPA architecture (warranties, indemnities, conditions, price)
  • Disclosure letter drafting and disclosure regime design

Typical documents and deliverables

Typical documents and deliverables

  • Legal due diligence report (red-flag or full-scope)
  • Issues list tagged by impact on the transaction
  • Disclosure letter and disclosed-documents bundle
  • Recommended SPA mark-up reflecting findings
  • Conditions precedent schedule
  • Specific indemnities and warranty-package proposal
  • Q&A log and data-room index

How we support the process

How we support the process

  1. 1

    Scope, materiality and reporting format agreed with the transaction team at the outset

  2. 2

    Data room access and a Q&A discipline established with the seller before the review begins

  3. 3

    The person who takes on the matter stays involved in the review through to the final report

  4. 4

    Regular findings updates aimed at avoiding surprises at the end

  5. 5

    Final report with clear next steps and SPA implications

Questions clients ask before instructing us

Questions clients ask before instructing us

How long does legal due diligence take?
Legal due diligence begins once the data room is properly populated. The duration depends less on the size of the target than on data room quality. A well-organised room with complete contract sets and a responsive management team can be reviewed efficiently, whereas a room delivered in tranches with missing annexes and unanswered Q&A takes longer. We front-load the items that can change the transaction, including title, capacity, key contracts, financing and change of control, so that the negotiation is not waiting for the full report.
Red-flag report or full-scope report?
Red-flag reporting suits repeat buyers, bolt-on programmes, smaller transactions and situations where W&I insurance is not in play. It reports only issues above an agreed materiality threshold, with a recommendation attached to each. Full-scope reporting can serve a second purpose alongside the negotiation, since financing, board approval and insurance underwriting may call for a complete record. W&I insurers commonly require evidence of a thorough process, but the required scope depends on the insurer and transaction. A hybrid approach may be appropriate, with full scope in the areas that carry the greatest risk on the particular target and red-flag coverage elsewhere, agreed in a scoping call at the outset.
What is the difference between vendor due diligence and buyer due diligence?
Vendor diligence is commissioned by the seller before the process starts and is made available to bidders on reliance terms. It surfaces problems while the seller still has time to fix them, can shorten the buyer's own work, and keeps control of the narrative around difficult findings. Buyer diligence is adversarial in purpose: it exists to test the seller's presentation and to generate negotiating positions on price, warranties, indemnities and conditions. A VDD report is best assessed independently before it is relied on. We advise buyers to read it for what it does not say, to run confirmatory work on the areas that matter to the investment thesis, and to check that the reliance letter in fact gives a claim.
Do we need to investigate every contract?
Not every contract needs to be reviewed, and a scope defined without reference to materiality tends to absorb budget without improving the outcome. We agree a materiality threshold and a set of criteria at the scoping stage: contracts above a revenue or spend threshold, all contracts with the top customers and suppliers by concentration, everything with a change-of-control, exclusivity, non-compete, most-favoured-nation or unusual termination provision, all financing and security documents, all leases, and all IP and IT agreements that the business cannot operate without. Everything else is sampled. Sampling is defensible where the sample is genuinely random and the standard-form contracts have been reviewed. Where a sample reveals systematic problems, the scope expands, which is the purpose of a properly designed sample.
How are diligence findings reflected in the SPA?
Findings translate into one of five outcomes, and selecting the right one is the substance of the exercise. A known, quantified liability may become a specific indemnity or a price reduction. An unknown risk in a defined area may become a targeted warranty. A problem that must be resolved before completion may become a condition precedent. A problem that must be resolved afterwards may become a post-closing covenant. An item disclosed and accepted may qualify the warranties to the extent provided in the SPA; it does not automatically remove a buyer's claim. The report should make clear whether the findings call for changes to the SPA. Where useful, we draft the recommended SPA language into the report itself, so that the transaction team can move straight from finding to negotiation.
Can the firm act as Dutch lead counsel on a cross-border due diligence?
We act as Dutch lead counsel on cross-border due diligence. We run Dutch-law diligence as part of multi-jurisdictional processes, coordinate local counsel where the target has foreign subsidiaries, consolidate reporting into a single format that the transaction team can use, and manage the Q&A process so that questions are not duplicated across firms. Our experience in cross-border processes helps us identify material risks and assess where local counsel reporting merits closer examination. We report in English by default and use the buyer's house template where one exists.
How does W&I insurance change the diligence process?
W&I insurance changes the process substantially. The insurer underwrites the process and not only the warranties, so scope shortcuts that a buyer might accept commercially can create gaps in cover. Insurers expect full-scope reporting in the material areas, a documented Q&A trail and a disclosure exercise they can inspect. They will run their own underwriting call and may exclude identified risks that are not otherwise addressed. Typical exclusions can include known issues, secondary tax liabilities, tax structuring risk, pension underfunding, environmental matters and forward-looking statements, but the policy wording remains decisive. In practice this means that the broker is engaged at the scoping stage rather than after the report is written, so that the diligence plan and the policy are designed together.

Planning due diligence? Let's agree the scope early.

Get in touch