Management buy-ins

A management buy-in is structurally similar to an MBO, but the operating team comes from outside the target. The risk profile changes accordingly, in that the incoming team has less internal information, relies more heavily on due diligence, and negotiates the warranties and the post-closing protections with greater care. We advise buy-in teams and their sponsors on Dutch and cross-border MBIs, with particular attention to the management equity layer, the leaver provisions and the transition arrangements that support the first hundred days of ownership.

When clients call us

  • An external management team has identified a target and a sponsor
  • A sponsor wants to back a buy-in into a Dutch target
  • Transition arrangements with outgoing management need careful drafting
  • An MBI with a rollover or partial sale needs structuring

Key legal & commercial issues

I.

Diligence and risk

Buy-in teams typically have less visibility of the target than the existing management. That shifts the transaction towards more extensive due diligence, a more carefully negotiated warranty package and well-defined post-closing protections, and towards a transition arrangement with outgoing management that genuinely transfers know-how.

II.

Management equity in an MBI

  • Sweet equity sized to reward delivery against the new plan
  • Vesting tied to the buy-in team's start dates, not the closing of the transaction alone
  • Leaver provisions calibrated to the higher uncertainty of an outside team
  • Ratchets aligned with the sponsor's return waterfall
III.

Transition with existing management

Where existing management is not staying, the SPA needs clear handover arrangements, knowledge transfer, customer introductions, IP and IT continuity, without giving outgoing management leverage over the buy-in plan. Where some existing managers stay, their position relative to the buy-in team needs careful drafting.

What we advise on

What we advise on

  • Buy-in team representation and management equity terms
  • Sponsor representation on Dutch MBIs
  • Diligence scoping for external teams
  • SPA architecture for buy-in transactions
  • Transition agreements with outgoing management
  • Leaver, vesting and ratchet mechanics
  • Shareholders' agreement and articles of NewCo
  • Senior facilities and security documentation

Typical documents and deliverables

Typical documents and deliverables

  • Buy-in team term sheet (management equity)
  • Share purchase agreement (NewCo as buyer)
  • Subscription agreement and shareholders' agreement
  • Articles of association of NewCo
  • Management service / employment agreements
  • Transition services / knowledge transfer agreements
  • Financing documents and security

How we support the process

How we support the process

  1. 1

    A first conversation on the buy-in thesis, the structure and the capital plan

  2. 2

    Management equity terms and the SPA negotiated in parallel rather than in sequence

  3. 3

    One coherent package across the SPA, the financing, the shareholders' agreement and the articles

  4. 4

    Transition arrangements with outgoing management documented while leverage still sits with the incoming team

  5. 5

    Closing, day-one logistics and follow-through on retention and knowledge transfer

Questions clients ask before instructing us

Questions clients ask before instructing us

How does an MBI differ from an MBO?
In an MBO the buying team already runs the business and knows what it is buying. In an MBI the team is external, and that difference has three consequences. Information asymmetry is material, so due diligence has to do the work that management knowledge would otherwise do, and the warranty and indemnity package carries considerably more weight. Execution risk is higher, because the incoming team has to establish authority over people who did not choose them. The seller may also stay involved through an earn-out or a rollover, which means the incoming team is negotiating its future working relationship at the same time as the price. These factors can affect pricing and transaction structure.
Do buy-in teams need their own counsel?
Buy-in teams need their own counsel, instructed separately from the sponsor's advisors, since the sponsor's lawyers act for the fund. On the management equity terms, the leaver provisions, the service agreements, the non-compete and the personal warranties, management's interests and the sponsor's are not necessarily aligned, and the documents tend to reflect the positions that were advised on. Independent advice is also what makes the leaver definitions negotiable rather than presented as settled. The cost is usually modest against the value of the participation, and sponsors generally expect it, because points left unaddressed at this stage tend to resurface at a less convenient moment. Sponsors will usually contribute to reasonable management counsel fees.
How important is the transition with outgoing management?
The transition can be one of the largest risks in an MBI, and it is a legal question as much as a human one. Customer and supplier relationships often sit with the departing owner personally, key employees may be loyal to that person, and operational knowledge that was never recorded in a system leaves with them. The tools available are contractual: a properly scoped transitional services or consultancy arrangement with defined deliverables and a real term, non-compete and non-solicit covenants drafted for enforceability under Dutch law, an earn-out or deferred consideration aligned to retention of key accounts, and retention arrangements for the employees who matter. We advise settling all of it before signing, while leverage still sits with the incoming team.
Are MBI valuations typically lower than MBO valuations?
Valuation in an MBI reflects the information, integration and transition risks associated with an incoming team, as well as the financing available for the transaction. Those risks can be addressed through structure rather than through price alone, for example through deferred consideration, an earn-out tied to retention of key customers, a vendor loan or a seller rollover that keeps the seller economically invested during the transition. Each mechanism should allocate risk to the party best placed to manage it.
Can an MBI involve partial sellers staying in?
Partial sellers may stay in, and that can be the structure that makes the transaction work. A buy-in and buy-out, or BIMBO, combines an incoming team with continuing incumbents, and a partial seller rollover keeps the founder invested during the transition. The documentation then has to do more work, in the form of a shareholders' agreement that sets out how the incoming and continuing shareholders share control, reserved matters, board composition, deadlock provisions, and separate leaver terms for each group, since a rolling founder and a buying-in CEO need not sit under identical vesting. We advise defining the founder's operational role and its end date explicitly, because ambiguity about who is actually running the business is a material risk.

Buying into a business? Get the equity terms right first.

Get in touch