walslaw, Amsterdam boutique law firm
ENNL

Management participation

Management participation aligns the interests of the people running the venture with those of the partners funding it. A well-designed arrangement can attract and retain the right team and reward genuine value creation, whereas an arrangement that is not carefully designed can become a long-running source of friction over vesting, valuation, leaver treatment and the position on exit. We advise Dutch and international parties on management equity in JVs, private companies and sponsor-backed structures, with a focus on arrangements that hold up through a change of control and a difficult leaver.

When clients call us

  • A sponsor-backed transaction needs a management equity plan
  • A JV is building its first management equity programme
  • A senior hire is conditioning acceptance on a sweet-equity package
  • An existing manager is leaving and valuation under the leaver clause is contested
  • An exit is approaching and the management waterfall needs review

Key legal & commercial issues

I.

What management participation has to do

  • Alignment of managers' upside with the venture's value creation
  • Retention of key people through vesting and good-leaver and bad-leaver mechanics
  • Reward at exit calibrated to each manager's actual contribution
  • Tax considerations identified with tax counsel
  • Durability through a change of control, with clear consequences
II.

Common structures in Dutch transactions

  • Sweet equity: managers acquire a small slice of equity at low entry cost
  • Stichting administratiekantoor (STAK) with depositary receipts
  • Phantom equity, SARs and bonus plans tied to exit
  • Options and warrants (with attention to Dutch tax treatment)
  • Co-investment alongside sponsors with put/call mechanics
III.

Vesting and leaver provisions

Vesting is a central mechanism in a management equity arrangement. We design time-based vesting, commonly running over four to five years and often with a one-year cliff, calibrated to performance milestones where appropriate. Leaver provisions define the agreed consequences of a departure, including whether and at what price interests must be transferred. The categories and their consequences need to align with the relevant management or employment arrangements and require a case-specific employment-law assessment.

What we advise on

What we advise on

  • Sweet equity and co-investment design for management teams
  • STAK structures with depositary receipts
  • Vesting schedules with time and performance components
  • Good-leaver and bad-leaver provisions and valuation mechanics
  • Exit waterfalls including management ratchets
  • Tax-aligned structuring with tax counsel
  • Drag-along and tag-along impact on management equity
  • Dispute prevention and resolution around leaver valuations

Typical documents and deliverables

Typical documents and deliverables

  • Management equity term sheet
  • Subscription and shareholders' agreement (management adherence)
  • STAK trust conditions and depositary receipts terms
  • Vesting and leaver schedule
  • Management or employment agreement amendments aligned with equity terms
  • Notarial deeds for issuance of shares to management

How we support the process

How we support the process

  1. 1

    An early assessment of the venture, the team and the drivers of value creation

  2. 2

    Design of the participation structure alongside tax counsel before terms are offered

  3. 3

    Drafting of the participation documents, aligned with the shareholders' agreement throughout

  4. 4

    Implementation of the issuance, the notarial steps and the registration that follows

  5. 5

    Valuation and execution support on leaver events and on the eventual exit

Questions clients ask before instructing us

Questions clients ask before instructing us

What is sweet equity and why is it popular in Dutch transactions?
Sweet equity is ordinary share capital subscribed by management at low cost alongside an investor whose contribution is made largely as shareholder loan or preference shares. Because the investor's instrument ranks first and accrues a return, the ordinary shares only produce value above that hurdle, so a small percentage of the equity converts into a meaningful share of the upside. It is popular in Dutch transactions because BV law accommodates the necessary share classes easily, because it aligns management with an exit rather than with annual earnings, and because it requires modest cash from management. The structure depends for its success on the leaver provisions and on the Dutch tax analysis under the lucrative interest regime.
Why use a STAK with depositary receipts?
A stichting administratiekantoor holds the shares and issues depositary receipts to participants, separating economic entitlement from voting rights. The foundation exercises the votes, and the participants receive the economic entitlement. For management participation this solves several problems at once: the cap table stays clean regardless of how many participants join and leave, the company deals with one shareholder rather than fifty, notarial deeds are not required for each transfer of receipts, and the articles of association and the administration conditions determine the participants' meeting and information rights. The trade-offs are the cost of maintaining the structure, the need for careful drafting of the administration conditions, and participant perception that they hold something less than shares.
What is a typical vesting schedule?
In Dutch sponsor-backed transactions, four to five years is standard, either straight-line annually or with a one-year cliff followed by monthly or quarterly vesting. Many structures use time vesting alone; others combine time vesting with an exit condition, so that unvested value crystallises only on a realisation event. Acceleration on a change of control is common but should be deliberate: full acceleration on any exit removes the retention effect precisely when the buyer wants management to stay, so single-trigger acceleration is often replaced with double-trigger, requiring both an exit and a departure. Whatever the schedule, the documents should address what happens on an extension of the hold period, which is increasingly common.
How are good and bad leavers valued differently?
The agreement determines the circumstances in which a participant is a good leaver or a bad leaver and the agreed price consequences. Good leavers are often offered fair market value, or the higher of subscription cost and market value; bad leavers may be required to transfer at the lower of cost and market value. Many Dutch transactions add an intermediate early-leaver category with a sliding scale by reference to time served. The enforceability of the definitions, pricing and forfeiture consequences requires a case-specific assessment under employment law and the rules on contractual penalties, with specialist employment counsel where appropriate.
Can management participation trigger Dutch tax issues?
Yes. The tax consequences should be assessed by a Dutch tax advisor at the design stage. The lucrative interest regime in the Income Tax Act can recharacterise returns on leveraged management instruments as box 1 income, rather than box 2 substantial-interest income. Whether that regime applies, and the tax treatment of an incentive plan, depend on a current case-specific analysis of the instruments and holding structure. Shares acquired below market value may also have employment-tax consequences. We coordinate the corporate structuring with tax counsel, while management obtains independent advice of its own.
What happens to management equity on a drag-along sale?
Typically, the drag is exercised, management sells on the same terms as the dragging shareholder, and proceeds run through the waterfall: investor loan notes and preferred return first, then the ordinary shares where sweet equity pays out. Three points warrant attention before management signs up. The first is whether the drag requires identical terms, including the price per share of the same class, rather than merely permitting the buyer to differentiate. The second is whether management is required to give warranties on an exit and whether its liability is capped at its net proceeds and several rather than joint. The third is whether a partial exit, a refinancing or a listing triggers the same treatment, since those events are often drafted differently or omitted altogether.

Related areas

Back to Joint ventures & strategic alliances

Building a management equity plan? Let's make it durable.

Get in touch